Blockchain as Lubricant for the Job Market Gears

Current state of affairs From an economic point of view, the job market has always been characterized by two peculiarly pronounced features: Search Costs Job seekers have to find information about available job offerings, apply to them and keep track of the applications. Companies have to post job offerings, receive …

Read More

A Blockchain-Based Approach for Academic Scientific Publishing

Current state of affairs Academic and scientific publishing has a very specific set of requirements and a peculiar editing process. The latter can be summarised as follows: Authors submit their works (generally an abstract and subsequently, if the abstract is accepted, a full paper) for review; Reviewers receive an anonymised …

Read More

Web 3.0: the triumph of the incumbent?

One of the most successful narratives in modern capitalism is that of disruptive innovation, with its corollary of the fall of the incumbent and the rise of some upstart. We all know how it goes: there is a big, large, lazy established powerhouse that is well-established and conservative in style and approach. Suddenly, they are outmaneuvered and outperformed by some new player who is able to understand and use the power of innovation. This narrative is very appealing for many reasons: it is always easy to write a good story on this premise, it speaks to the good old feeling of rooting for the underdog and it satisfies a sense of justice, rewarding ingenuity and audacity over the conservativeness of the establishment. Above all, it resonates very well with way the United States tends to represent itself, starting at least with Theodore Roosevelt, as an upstart nation and innovator who looks towards the future while the old European empires are rooted in their glorious past.

However, the appeal of a narrative does not necessarily make it true. The fact is that the early years of the digital revolution saw the epic rise and fall of titans like Texas Instruments, IBM and Microsoft — although the latter was more like a dip. But it is also true that the big five (Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google and Microsoft), or the ‘tech giants’, may be here to stay: generally speaking, upstarts and newcomers succeed in relatively new industries, where the incumbents remain below a certain critical mass and their position is still weak.

Read More

Web 3.0 – A New Hope

The previous article of the series was very gloomy about the current state of the Web, but we promised that we were going to be much more optimistic about the future in this issue of the Blockchain for Books series.
In fact, a new generation of distributed P2P and blockchain-based technologies for file sharing and storage, called IPFS and Filecoin, have the potential to shake up the status quo, correct the pitfalls of Web 2.0 and let us enter into the “Web 3.0” era.
A comprehensive analysis by Stefano Tombolini, blockchain analyst and WordPress implementer at Tombolini & Ascciati.

Read More

The Paradise Lost of Web 2.0

In the previous article of this series, we stated that the Web 2.0 revolution actually led us to the centralization of Internet services and questioned whether blockchain technology could enable a Web 3.0 evolution.
In his book Who Owns the Future?, the computer philosophy writer Jaron Lanier explains how the big tech companies that survived the dot-com bubble and consequently thrived are “stealing” and monetizing users’ data, without any respect for privacy and the economic rights of content owners.
What went wrong with the Web 2.0 movement?
A comprehensive analysis by Stefano Tombolini, blockchain analyst and WordPress implementer at Tombolini & Associati.

Read More

Ridimensiona font